Одночасно з трансляцiями! Перевірено PRO
- Дiйсно холодний Розумне управління живленням та найпередовiша архітектура.
- Штучний інтелект Передбачає необхідність ігор та програм в продуктивності.
- Може все і навіть більше Упiзнає чудовi кулери і підвищує продуктивність понад звичайних лімітів.
- Машинне навчання Легко запускає ігри без зависань і затримок, завантажуючи необхідні дані заздалегідь.
Процесор з iнтелектом
и более 100 игр на ПК*
В одному революцiйному чипi.
X570 для сокета AM4
кому необходима передовая производительность, максимальная пропускная способность
и скорость, от которой захватывает дух.
Детальнiше
Экстремальная производительность.
RZ2-1: Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 3/02/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Core i7-8700K, Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Multiprocessing performance represented by Cinebench R15 nT multiprocessing performance. Mainstream desktop platform means Socket AM4 for AMD platforms and LGA 1151 for Intel platforms. he Ryzen 7 2700X (AMD’s highest performing mainstream desktop processor) achieved a score of 1837 (1837/1397=up to 36% faster than the Core i7-8700K), while the Core i7-8700K (Intel’s highest performing mainstream desktop processor) achieved a score of 1397 (1397/1837= up to 76% as fast, or up to 24% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700X).
RZ2-2: Testing by AMD Performance labs as of 3/02/2018 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. AMD System Config: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, ‘Turpan’ reference motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Intel System Config: Intel Core i7-8700K, Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Graphics Card, Graphics driver 390.77, and a Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD using the Windows 10 RS3 operating system. Multiprocessing performance represented by Cinebench R15 nT multiprocessing performance. Processor class is defined here by competing price points between MSRP $380 and $220 USD. Suggested pricing found at ark.intel.com and amd.com. The Ryzen 7 2700X achieved a score of 1807 (1807/1405= up to 29% faster than the Core i7-8700K), while the Core i7-8700K (MSRP $370) achieved a score of 1405 (1405/1807= up to 78% as fast, or up to 22% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700X). The Ryzen 7 2700 (MSRP $299) achieved a score of 1569 (1569/1392=up to 12% faster than the Core i7-8700), while the Core i7-8700 (MSRP $370) achieved a score of 1392 (1392/1569= up to 89% as fast, or up to 11% slower than the Ryzen 7 2700). The Ryzen 5 2600X (MSRP $249) achieved a score of 1380 (1380/1029= up to 34% faster than the Core i5-8600K), while the Core i5-8600K (MSRP $258) achieved a score of 1029 (1029/1380= up to 75% as fast, or up to 25% slower than the Ryzen 5 2600X). The Ryzen 5 2600 (MSRP $249) achieved a score of 1297 (1297/1024= up to 26% faster than the Core i5-8600), while the Core i5-8600 (MSRP $258) achieved a score of 1026 (1024/1297= up to 79% as fast, or up to 21% slower than the Ryzen 5 2600).
RZ2-4 As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/12/2018. Application Scores (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Intel Core i7-8700K): Cinebench R15 (“3D Rendering”): 1846 v. 1396 (1846/1396=132%, or) 32% faster; Blender 2.79 (“3D rendering”): 22.06 seconds vs. 26.6 seconds (22.06/26.6=83% as much time to render, or) 17% faster; Handbrake 1.0.7 (“video encoding”): 497 seconds vs. 604 seconds (497/604=82% as much time to render, or) 18% faster; TrueCrypt 1GB AES (“file encryption”): 11.1 vs. 8 (11.1/8=138% as fast, or) or 38% faster; POVRay 3.7 nT (“raytracing”), 3768 vs. 2959 (3768/2959=127% as fast, or) or 27% faster; Nicehash miner (“Blockchain Mining”), 532 H/s vs. 304 H/s (532/304=1.75% as fast, or) 75% faster; 7-Zip (“File Compression”), 46195 MIPS vs 39779 MIPS (46195/39779=116% as fast, or) 16% faster. Average of all “content creation” percentages (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake, POVRay=32%, 17%, 18%, 27%): 24% higher performance for AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 140 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers and system configurations.
RZ2-8 As measured by AMD Performance Labs on 03/14/2018. All games tested at 2560x1440 resolution with the in-game “High” image quality presets. Results ordered in AMD vs. Intel (Relative%): Grand Theft Auto™ V: 98 vs. 104 (-5%); Metro: Last Light™ Redux: 161 vs. 142 (+13%); Ashes of the Singularity™: 87 vs. 89 (-2%); Deus Ex: Mankind Divided™: 72 vs. 72 (Tie); Sid Meier's Civilization® VI: 89 vs. 98 (-9%); F1® 2017: 127 vs. 137 (-7%); Middle-earth™: Shadow of War™: 84 vs. 85 (-1%); HITMAN® (2016): 89 vs. 90 (-2%); Overwatch™: 130 vs. 134 (-3%); The Witcher™ 3: 83 vs. 85 (-2%); Tom Clancy's The Division™: 95.5 vs. 95 (Tie); Rise of the Tomb Raider™: 113 vs. 113 (Tie); Average of all percentages: -1%. Test configuration: Reference Motherboard + AMD Ryzen™ 7 2700X, Gigabyte AORUS Z370 + Core i7-8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 390.77), 2x8 GB DDR4-3200 (14-14-14-36), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS3), Samsung 850 Pro SSD. Performance may vary with different drivers and system configurations.